THE BRADLEY LAB
  • Home
  • People
  • Research
  • Publications
  • News
  • Classes
  • Gallery
Picture

Margaret writes an AMP'D blog post for the UK Arctic Office, NERC

4/12/2021

0 Comments

 
Margaret writes a piece for the UK Arctic Office on the AMP'D project, which is published on their website today, and copied below.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
The Arctic is warming faster than other areas of Earth. For scientists studying climate change in the Arctic, fieldwork is important for observing and studying how Arctic warming is affecting environmental systems. This past month, I participated in an expedition to Svalbard supported by the US Department of Energy, British Antarctic Survey and Norwegian Polar Institute.

The project, led by Dr. Karen Lloyd and Dr. Tatiana Vishnivetskaya of the University of Tennessee, is called Arctic Microbial Permafrost Degradation (or AMP’d, for short). Our goal is to identify the activity of microbes in permafrost as it thaws due to climate warming. Permafrost contains large amounts of trapped organic matter. When it thaws this organic matter gets decomposed by microbes and fuels the microbial production of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane. Understanding the microbial contribution to greenhouse gas emissions from thawing permafrost can help climate modellers better predict future climate warming. At present, microbial activity in Svalbard permafrost is not well understood. With this project we aim to understand how microbial communities in Svalbard will respond to permafrost thaw and climate warming.
​
Doing fieldwork in Svalbard during the Coronavirus pandemic comes with some challenges. Each member of the team had to do at least four Covid-19 tests and a 10-day hotel quarantine in Oslo before we could travel to Svalbard. After all the tests and the quarantine, we were confident that we were healthy and ready for fieldwork in Svalbard.

Our first stop in Svalbard was in Longyearbyen, the population centre of Svalbard. From there we took the MS Farm, a small charter boat, on a 14-hour journey to Ny-Ålesund, the small research town that served as our fieldwork base. Our route from Longyearbyen to Ny-Ålesund took us through the sound of Forlandsundet separating Prins Karls Forland and the west side of Spitsbergen. The boat slowly carved a path through the sea ice and allowed us to see some spectacular views of mountains and ice on our journey to Ny-Ålesund.


When we arrived in Ny-Ålesund our first task was to find the fieldwork gear, assemble the drill, and set up the lab where we would prepare permafrost samples for microbiological analyses. 
We divided into a “drilling team” and a “lab team” with the drilling team focused on finding suitable areas near Ny-Alesund for drilling permafrost, and the lab team focused on sectioning permafrost cores and preparing them for future microbiological analyses in our home laboratories.​

Contamination is a central challenge for drilling any material for microbiology investigations, including permafrost. Often fluids are used to support the drilling process but using drilling fluids can contaminate permafrost with foreign microbes. Since our investigations focused on in situ microbes, avoiding contam-ination was essential. Avoiding contamination is particularly important when the abundance of microbes in the permafrost is low, which preliminary investigations of the microbiology of this area suggest. Con-tamination may obscure real microbial signals. Our drill did not use drilling fluids, and because of this, friction between the drill barrel (the rotating cylinder at the end of the drill that cut out permafrost core sections) and the surrounding permafrost created heat that could melt the permafrost. Preventing the core material from getting too warm during drilling was therefore also important. ​
Picture
Permafrost core sections were removed from the earth in ~30 cm intervals in core liners that held together the structure of the permafrost. Varying with depth, the permafrost material was dry, loose, and sandy, and sometimes it was hard and consolidated like rock. Coloured layers could be seen at different depths of the core from the same borehole hinting that different layers have different geochemistry and different in situ microbial metabolisms. In the lab, we separated each core section into smaller sections so that specific permafrost layers could be analyzed for microbiology and biogeochemistry. The cores from each of these were stored frozen and transported to laboratories in London, Naples, New Jersey, and Knoxville, for experiments and analyses that will soon help us understand how microbes in Svalbard permafrost are affected by and participate in Arctic warming.
Picture
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    June 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • People
  • Research
  • Publications
  • News
  • Classes
  • Gallery